4 ms·

You can have a belief that this is wrong result based on nothing. If you want to say that this is fraudulent then you have to prove that this is fraud. There is

You can have a belief that this is wrong result based on nothing. If you want to say that this is fraudulent then you have to prove that this is fraud. There is a difference as I said in my comment.

goodSteveramos 3y ago
Thats not how anything in science works. You should be able to express your beliefs without having absolute proof and get fined if a court doesn't agree with you.
- bluish29 3y ago
  Actually if we are talking about science and not freedom of speech. Technically you are wrong, to work in science you have to follow scientific method and publish your conclusions with your methods, data and models.. etc. You can say whatever you want within this framework. A significant portion of the publications in any field is found wrong later sometimes by the authors themselves. But claiming that a work is fraud is not ab opinion. Actually even disagreeing between actual scientists usually comes in form of other work proving the other work is wrong. Welcome to the scientific community.
- arrrg 3y ago
  Saying “this is wrong” is very different from saying “this is fraud”. Why is it so hard for you to tell the difference? You never even need to engage with the question of whether something is fraud when disputing something. If you say that there are 75 million people living in Germany I don’t need to call you a lier or a fraud to say that you are wrong and dispute your statement. That‘s just not necessary. I can just point at this website https://www.destatis.de/EN/Themes/Society-Environment/Population/Current-Population/_node.html https://www.destatis.de/EN/Themes/Society-Environment/Popula... and say you are wrong. What do I care whether you simply misremembered, go wrong information from someone else and believed them or are actively lying.

4 ms·

You can have a belief that this is wrong result based on nothing. If you want to say that this is fraudulent then you have to prove that this is fraud. There is

by bluish29 3y ago

You can have a belief that this is wrong result based on nothing. If you want to say that this is fraudulent then you have to prove that this is fraud. There is a difference as I said in my comment.

goodSteveramos 3y ago
Thats not how anything in science works. You should be able to express your beliefs without having absolute proof and get fined if a court doesn't agree with you.
- bluish29 3y ago
  Actually if we are talking about science and not freedom of speech. Technically you are wrong, to work in science you have to follow scientific method and publish your conclusions with your methods, data and models.. etc. You can say whatever you want within this framework. A significant portion of the publications in any field is found wrong later sometimes by the authors themselves. But claiming that a work is fraud is not ab opinion. Actually even disagreeing between actual scientists usually comes in form of other work proving the other work is wrong. Welcome to the scientific community.
- arrrg 3y ago
  Saying “this is wrong” is very different from saying “this is fraud”. Why is it so hard for you to tell the difference? You never even need to engage with the question of whether something is fraud when disputing something. If you say that there are 75 million people living in Germany I don’t need to call you a lier or a fraud to say that you are wrong and dispute your statement. That‘s just not necessary. I can just point at this website https://www.destatis.de/EN/Themes/Society-Environment/Population/Current-Population/_node.html https://www.destatis.de/EN/Themes/Society-Environment/Popula... and say you are wrong. What do I care whether you simply misremembered, go wrong information from someone else and believed them or are actively lying.