3 ms·
> I don’t know what the right answer here is but it would be nice to explore the topic more than “Musk is bad”. I mean, Musk has been on the vanguard of the "U
by jszymborski 3y ago
> I don’t know what the right answer here is but it would be nice to explore the topic more than “Musk is bad”.
I mean, Musk has been on the vanguard of the "Ukraine's resistance is futile" push. You can call speculation on this line specious, unthinking "Musk is bad" rhetoric, but at some point negative criticism of a person is relevant.
It takes zero imagination to conceive of Musk turning a blind eye to Russia's use of Starlink, it would be consistent with the way he speaks on X/Twitter.
It may seem like bashing, but honestly it's easy to run out of good things to say about some people.
- infecto 3y agoActually it does take some imagination. As does thinking that somehow starlink does not have to answer to the state department. My point being that no matter what narrative we want to use for Musk, ultimately there is some accountability to the state department for tools used in war.