3 ms·
I consider writing simulations and analyzing data as working on biology. I don't consider pontificating about biology to be.
by mkoubaa 3y ago
I consider writing simulations and analyzing data as working on biology. I don't consider pontificating about biology to be.
- nathan_compton 3y agoExcuse my plain language, but it is dumb to baldly assert that all philosophy is pontificating.
- mkoubaa 3y agoI agree, that would be really dumb. While I am prone to saying and doing dumb things, I think it'd be sloppy to suggest that I made that assertion. There's a set of things that include lab work, simulation, data analysis, etc that I consider doing biology, and another set of things that I consider philosophy of biology. The latter set includes pontification but also more analytical and serious work. But it is still wrong to compare Spinoza's interest in optics to a contemporary philosopher of biology's interest in biology unless that person also does biology. I don't hold philosophers to the impossible standard of classical polymaths, but I still don't feel a mere philosopher of X is as deeply interested in X as a practitioner of X.