3 ms·
The point, which I can only assume that you intentionally missed, is the following: - Light is only a standin for any economic activity. The same argument hold
by _Algernon_ 3y ago
The point, which I can only assume that you intentionally missed, is the following:
- Light is only a standin for any economic activity. The same argument holds for manufacturing, steel smelting, and basically any other economic activity you can think of.
- We spend ~2000x less per unit of light but create much more than 2000x the amount of total artificial light now compared to the 1800s. Hence greater overall energy consumption.
Now read my initial comment again and I will have the utmost - probably misplaced - faith that you'll understand it.
- boxed 3y ago> Light is only a standin for any economic activity And yet for exactly light the entire premise is falsified. It's a hilarious own goal.
- _Algernon_ 3y agoIt's not which I just explained to you. If you are going to keep pretending to be the human embodiment of a brick wall, I won't engage any further. Have a nice day!