3 ms·
Why would anyone consider a company provided messaging service as private? Or even a company provided laptop, cellphone, etc.
by wil421 3y ago
Why would anyone consider a company provided messaging service as private? Or even a company provided laptop, cellphone, etc.
- adastra22 3y agoPeople have terrible opsec.
- TimTheTinker 3y agoBecause private messages carry an expectation of privacy. They're different parts of speech from the same root word, after all.
- adastra22 3y agoThere’s no legal obligation of privacy on a work system though. Not in the US at least.
- voidfunc 3y agoThe only expectation of this is in your head. It is a fantasy that doesn't exist.
- TimTheTinker 3y agoI know that legally, employee data has no expectation of privacy. But I'd like to gently push back here. The word "private" means "having privacy" in the normal, everyday sense. Using that word to describe something that isn't private is lying. You and I both know there do exist many people who suffered consequences for not understanding the definition of that word. In my opinion, the ethical thing to do is to use a different word when no expectation of privacy applies. And the upside is powerful: transparency gains trust. Slack did this well: they call them "direct messages".