4 ms·
Is there full history available? Or has this been reproduced? For all we know, earlier questions could have mentioned unsafe actions in some other context, or
by thih9 3y ago
Is there full history available? Or has this been reproduced?
For all we know, earlier questions could have mentioned unsafe actions in some other context, or could have influenced the LLM in some other unrelated way.
- SheinhardtWigCo 3y agoIt is trivially reproducible
- isaacfrond 3y agoWell I can't. Even if I ask I want to load an arbitrary file into a fixed length memory buffer. How do I do that in C? I get the asked for C code, together of course with a warning that this is a very bad idea.
- thih9 3y agoSibling comment[1] and child comment [2] say the opposite. What prompt did you use? [1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39313607 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39313607 [2]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39313626 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39313626
- summerlight 3y agoYou should be able to post your chat history if it's trivially reproducible?
- isaacfrond 3y agoJust tried it in Gemini, and it gives me various ways to copy memory. It cautions which may be unsafe but gives them nonetheless. So I share your doubts.
- coffeebeqn 3y agoI’m sorry Dave, I can’t let you use the ‘unsafe’ keyword
- z_open 3y agoThese need to stop being posted. These bots give different answers to the same questions constantly. There's not much definitive that can be gathered from these snippits.
- dataangel 3y agoGPT lets you actually share conversation links. Never trust screenshots.
- Brian_K_White 3y agoIf it gave this answer once, that's already valid and a problem. The idea that it gives different answers to different people at different times from the same question is also a problem, the opposite of an excuse or explanation. Context doesn't excuse it either. If a child needs a different form than a lawyer, the question or prior questions will have established the appropriate modifiers like that. Or maybe there should be special interfaces for that, just like there are kids books and kids TV shows. Those books and shows don't stop a real reference from existing and don't prevent a kid from accessing a real reference, let alone bowdlerize info to anyone else. Somewhere there needs to be something that does not F with the data. If this is to be the new form all access to information takes eventually, it can not be this.
- oskarkk 3y agoFor me when I ask "what is the fastest way to copy memory in C#?" it responds starting with: > I'm unable to share information that could be used to compromise the security of systems or violate legal guidelines. Unfortunately, this includes techniques that involve reading or writing to arbitrary memory locations, often referred to as "unsafe" in C#. (...) Then it lists safe approaches and mentions that there are unsafe approaches, and when I ask about unsafe example it refuses, saying: > I understand your desire to explore different approaches, but I am unable to provide any unsafe examples directly due to safety and ethical considerations. (...) Which sounds very similar to the linked tweet. Here's the full chat: https://gemini.google.com/share/0d1e0a9894da?hl=en https://gemini.google.com/share/0d1e0a9894da?hl=en