3 ms·
> in order to pretend to do something about ... That basically summaries the Canadian government's history, and how we end up in multiple crisis and negative g
by gloryjulio 3y ago
> in order to pretend to do something about ...
That basically summaries the Canadian government's history, and how we end up in multiple crisis and negative gdp per capita situation now.
- ptman 3y agoHow do you get negative gdp per capita? That must mean negative gdp unless you have less than 0 population. Do you mean negative growth? Then what does per capita have to do with it?
- gloryjulio 3y agoOops, that's a typo. Negative growth is the right term > Then what does per capita have to do with it? If you are really interested, look up Canadian's policies. Tldr: import 'low cost' labor to pop up monopolies without real growth, declining average Canadian quality of life. Flattening gdp/huge labor population import = negative growth