2 ms·
It’s not a copy of the copyright itself. The trespass is on the copyright, not the copy. The disruption the trespass causes is of their sole right to license
by mr_toad 3y ago
It’s not a copy of the copyright itself. The trespass is on the copyright, not the copy.
The disruption the trespass causes is of their sole right to license that copyright.
- shiroiuma 3y agoThat sounds like overloading of the term "trespass" to me. The common definition is to physically go to places where you're not allowed to be.
- johnnyanmac 3y agonot overloaded, just an older (but official definition): archaic•literary commit an offense against (a person or a set of rules). But the word doesn't matter so much as the intent. If enough people just copy your product you cannot sell it. Or worse, others will sell it for pennies because they didn't spend any revenue so any money is profit. That's what's trying to be prevented.
- blackboxlogic 3y agoI've been reading on the topic recently and that is referred to as "criminal trespass". I want to put up signs that say "yes trespassing"