> sudo is certainly not the only player, there's also doas. This shows people can adapt to another name The fact that doas has far fewer users, and examples ev

> sudo is certainly not the only player, there's also doas. This shows people can adapt to another name The fact that doas has far fewer users, and examples everywhere show `sudo xyz` as the way to run xyz as root, shows that people do not adapt to a different name. Microsoft has been trying, for years, to get developers to use Windows systems. This is another good step towards doing so. The answer isn't to use a different name; the answer is to actually support most of the sudo interface. But that said, there's a subset of the sudo interface that would cover the majority of what most people need on a regular basis: -H (change home directory) -i (act like a login shell, which may not be meaningful on Windows but could at least be ignored for compatibility) -E (preserve the environment) -u (set the user to something other than root) -g (set the group) -s (just run a shell)