3 ms·

wow, kudos to Samsung design team -- they had really think this one through to comply with all the rules AND come up with a good looking product. Whats really

wow, kudos to Samsung design team -- they had really think this one through to comply with all the rules AND come up with a good looking product. Whats really is interesting here is that I read somewhere that each single iPhone is made of up to 60% Samsung components, solutions, patents, etc. How come then APPL is so bold with all those lawsuits? I know its a lot of money, but at some point Samsung could simply say "no more" and stop selling its technology to Apple, making it at least hard for them to keep up with the world demand.

taligent 15y ago
It's because business isn't a kindergarden playground. You don't just say "no more" to your biggest customer who is prepaying billions of dollars which you can then use to invest in new technologies. The same technologies which you can use across your product lines not just smartphones.
- joering2 15y ago
  I know all this but with Samsung having such a strong position on the market, isnt it a time to "kill" the competition? And Apple being so cocky they just help Samsung to make up their mind. I mean, yeah its not a kindergarten they dont have to provide Apple with their components. I would think Apple may want to be "nicer" to them not to get cut off from parts to build their products. Last thing they need right now, is money. They need to keep products flowing into the market.
  - ameasure 15y ago
    Apple isn't getting 50-70% profit margins on its iphones without market power.
saturn 15y ago
> at some point Samsung could simply say "no more" I don't think it really works like that. Apple doesn't show up at the Samsung Shop every day and ask to buy the next day's components for their factory. They have long term contracts, a year or more in advance, often including huge co-investments in the factory toolings which will be involved in manufacturing them. Of course I don't know the details but I doubt Apple or the courts would look too kindly on Samsung suddenly declining to fulfil their multi-billion-dollar, multi-year supply contracts because they wanted to help their own competing products. Samsung is very much wearing "golden handcuffs" in this situation.
- alan_cx 15y ago
  Hang on, Samsung have "shops"? But Apple has shops too. Have Apple not got the rights to "shop"?

taligent 15y ago

It's because business isn't a kindergarden playground. You don't just say "no more" to your biggest customer who is prepaying billions of dollars which you can then use to invest in new technologies. The same technologies which you can use across your product lines not just smartphones.

joering2 15y ago
I know all this but with Samsung having such a strong position on the market, isnt it a time to "kill" the competition? And Apple being so cocky they just help Samsung to make up their mind. I mean, yeah its not a kindergarten they dont have to provide Apple with their components. I would think Apple may want to be "nicer" to them not to get cut off from parts to build their products. Last thing they need right now, is money. They need to keep products flowing into the market.
- ameasure 15y ago
  Apple isn't getting 50-70% profit margins on its iphones without market power.

saturn 15y ago

> at some point Samsung could simply say "no more" I don't think it really works like that. Apple doesn't show up at the Samsung Shop every day and ask to buy the next day's components for their factory. They have long term contracts, a year or more in advance, often including huge co-investments in the factory toolings which will be involved in manufacturing them. Of course I don't know the details but I doubt Apple or the courts would look too kindly on Samsung suddenly declining to fulfil their multi-billion-dollar, multi-year supply contracts because they wanted to help their own competing products. Samsung is very much wearing "golden handcuffs" in this situation.

alan_cx 15y ago
Hang on, Samsung have "shops"? But Apple has shops too. Have Apple not got the rights to "shop"?