In fact it only issued a provisional statement that humanitarian care for the population of the Gaza Strip should continue, This is very clearly not what the r

In fact it only issued a provisional statement that humanitarian care for the population of the Gaza Strip should continue, This is very clearly not what the ruling says. And it is intellectually evasive to characterize as such, given that information about the ruling is widely and immediately available. And I don't mean "evasive" in terms of spin, polish or oversimplifying. But rather, of an overt attempt to obfuscate the nature of the ruling. There's no way that you, yourself, can plausibly believe the above statement you just made.