4 ms·

Compare that to what Eich achieved with brave in that period.

• jononor 3y ago
  I am a bit unsure how to interpret this... Has he achieved a lot, or nog so much, comparatively?
  • warkdarrior 3y ago
    He managed to do a lot of things with Brave, compared to how much Firefox changed. That's a fact irrespective of one likes Brave or not.
  • jacooper 3y ago
    He achieved a lot. Launched a new browser with full privacy protections by default, an independent search engine, a private LLM service and more while Mozilla just rebranded things from others.
  • deleted 3y ago
    [deleted]
• wolverine876 3y ago
  It's not a competition. Who are you or I to judge?
  • jacooper 3y ago
    If anything, it shows how Mozilla with it's resources are just wasting money, brave was bootstraped with a much smaller team and capital, yet they defended privacy in a way Firefox never could.
    • wolverine876 3y ago
      > they defended privacy in a way Firefox never could I have some familiarity with Brave. They use Chromium (or some components of it?) which is probably more secure from attackers. It has some built-in privacy, but how is it better than Firefox's?
      • jacooper 3y ago
        Because it blocks ads and all trackers with no exceptions? The reason is they aren't afraid from Google, in addition to that they launched a fully independent search engine and added new isolation features to chromium, like localhost access and cookie isolation.
        • wolverine876 3y ago
          > Because it blocks ads and all trackers with no exceptions? Are you asking me?
    • deleted 3y ago
      [deleted]
    • deleted 3y ago
      [deleted]
    • deleted 3y ago
      [deleted]