5 ms·
This line of thinking is useful for rejecting others who are pushing specific beliefs, but is demonstrably flawed for making conclusions about things that are i
by jncfhnb 3y ago
This line of thinking is useful for rejecting others who are pushing specific beliefs, but is demonstrably flawed for making conclusions about things that are intrinsically impossible to observe.
- JohnFen 3y agoThe thing is that it isn't a conclusion at all -- it's more of a suspension of arriving at a conclusion due to a lack of evidence supporting one.
- jncfhnb 3y agoIt “should” be
- me_me_me 3y ago> impossible to observe. Meaning those things don't exist. If a thing makes no interactions with our universe by definition it doesn't exists