5 ms·
I think it still is. A discussion forum like this lacks a number of features we'd commonly associate with social media.
by rootusrootus 3y ago
I think it still is. A discussion forum like this lacks a number of features we'd commonly associate with social media.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- vundercind 3y agoNo personalized feed or “watch next”? Not “social media”.
- dimask 3y agoThese are not necessary for social media, you can be in social media without these (it sometimes requires browser extensions but not necessarily).
- vundercind 3y agoThe term doesn’t have to mean what the literal words on their own do, or apply to everything that the individual words might, taken in their own. [edit] and in this case the term is far more useful if it is not as expansive as you suggest. We’d just need another term, then, to describe the kind of thing people usually mean by “social media”.
- diego_sandoval 3y agoI think the disctintion should be: Is the person (their face, their personality) more important, or the content of what they say is more important? HN falls much closer to the "content" end of the spectrum.
- vundercind 3y agoYeah, there are lots of other little aspects that push something closer to or farther from being the kind of thing we usual mean by “social media” (“so it’s a fuzzy category?” yes, like approximately all other categories and labels). Downplaying personal or account identity (which HN does to a more extreme degree than even most forums et c) definitely counts as moving something toward the “not social media” side.
- dnissley 3y agoIt has the most important (and most addictive) feature though: an endless feed