3 ms·

I'm not seeing any related documents that explain what the goals and rationale for the project are.

• worksonmine 3y ago
  A princess doesn't have to explain herself.
  • moffkalast 3y ago
    Can't argue with that logic alright.
• fluidcruft 3y ago
  The top left corner gives the hint "A modern C-like Programming language with focus on structural typing." Not sure what "coding like royalty" is meant to mean honestly. To me royalty conjures useless rent-seeking incompetent cruft that sits on their ass and extracts value from their subjects.
  • bigbillheck 3y ago
    > Not sure what "coding like royalty" is meant to mean honestly C, but the headers have all been removed.
  • rob74 3y ago
    When I read "coding like royalty", the first thing I thought of was "let others do the coding for you". But in that case, you wouldn't care about the programming language...
  • 082349872349872 3y ago
    If this language is "coding like royalty", does that make no-code systems "coding for the cream of society"? (because they're aimed at the rich and thick)
  • vt85 3y ago
    [dead]
• josephg 3y ago
  I agree. Why should I care that this exists? Does it correct a flaw in zig / rust / C / Nim / Dmd? Does it explore the space of programming languages? (And if so, what’s actually new about it?). Or is it a way for the author to noodle around with their own programming language? I have no objection to any of those goals. But it would be nice if the author were clear about what they’re doing with the project.