3 ms·
I'm more surprised this even surfaced. I get a feeling in most other countries, this wouldn't be known about and everyone would just assume it happens.
by _cenw 3y ago
I'm more surprised this even surfaced. I get a feeling in most other countries, this wouldn't be known about and everyone would just assume it happens.
- whoswho 3y agoI would suggest, as a kind of an amusing game in possible scenario ideation, to assume that the people who wrote and published this article are running with the presumption that people already know these things are happening. So the main goal of this, therefore, would not be to enlighten an ignorant audience. We “know” that news are orchestrated. They’re not really news because they’re often planned weeks or months in advance. We “know” that the media is there to shape public opinion. But what could they write to appeal to our biases? Perhaps make a subset of us feel righteous, angry, or smug, on a given day? Play to our vices just to play with us and keep us occupied and entertained? Think about every person who posts something like “panem et circenses,” as a response, and imagine the smugness they feel at being so clever, has been a planned-for response from the people setting it all up.
- soco 3y agoI don't believe there can be a real expectation of secrecy nowadays, everything seems to surface at some point. Unless it doesn't and I would never know what I missed :)
- instagib 3y agoSomewhat. It becomes a cat and mouse game of who knows what and will expose that if this is exposed. Once exposed the weight of the threat is lost. Similar to bringing the Gatling gun to the battlefield or MAD. There are a lot of mitigations built in to protecting the things that need protection at an exceedingly high cost.