4 ms·
Thanks. So, slow as it may be, the win for UML (which seems to still have a heartbeat) is that it can run on uP without any specific virtualisation capabilitie
by nonrandomstring 3y ago
Thanks.
So, slow as it may be, the win for UML (which seems to still have a
heartbeat) is that it can run on uP without any specific
virtualisation capabilities, right? If I could run Linux on a Z80/6502
then in theory I could run a virtualised Linux on a Z80/6502.
- mark_undoio 3y agoYes - plus the original win of UML was also being able to run virtual instances on a kernel without proper virtualization capabilities. In the early 2000s people used to use UMLs as a hosting platform - they didn't have the same security isolation as a proper VM (or even, necessarily, of a container) though.
- als0 3y agoHow do containers have better security isolation than UML?
- nonrandomstring 3y agoWhen I tinkered with UML I think it was prior to cgroups (2007) [0] so my guess is that escaping the UML instance was easier. [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cgroups https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cgroups
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]