4 ms·
Is Gemini Ultra significantly better than Bard? Tried Bard a couple of times recently and was not very impressed tbh. Seemed to forget the context of the conve
by pier25 3y ago
Is Gemini Ultra significantly better than Bard?
Tried Bard a couple of times recently and was not very impressed tbh. Seemed to forget the context of the conversation very often. Like I had to repeat again and again to not show external links with previews and not give explanations to every little thing.
- ktta 3y agoAbsolutely. Bard felt worse than GPT-3.5 in some aspects. Gemini Ultra looks to be on par with GPT-4 and better than GPT-4 atleast when it comes to speed, which isn't trivial when expecting longform answers
- svat 3y ago• Bard when launched was using one of the PaLM models, which is inferior to GPT-3.5 (the free version of ChatGPT). • Bard since a couple of months ago was using Gemini Pro, which is roughly comparable (a bit worse or better depending on whom you ask) to GPT-3.5. • Bard is now (today) called Gemini, available as "Gemini" and "Gemini Advanced". The former is still comparable to the free version of ChatGPT, and the latter version costs $20/month and uses the "Gemini Ultra" model, and is meant to be roughly comparable to GPT 4 / the paid version of ChatGPT. (Their paper claimed it to be better than GPT 4 on some benchmarks, but real-world usage will show which way it goes — but it should be significantly better than Bard from recently. Edit: See https://www.oneusefulthing.org/p/google-gemini-advanced-tasting-notes https://www.oneusefulthing.org/p/google-gemini-advanced-tast... from someone who's been using it for six weeks.)