3 ms·
Others have made better points but I want to add another thing to point out you can also be making the same "is-ought" mistake yourself: Impaired drivers (drin
by scott_w 3y ago
Others have made better points but I want to add another thing to point out you can also be making the same "is-ought" mistake yourself:
Impaired drivers (drink, drugs, sleep), bad drivers, dangerous drivers, etc. who ought to use the self-driving function are exactly the kinds of people who won't and continue to drive badly.
What this means is the safer drivers leave it off (because they outperform the system), while dangerous drivers also leave it off because they mistakenly believe they outperform the system. The traits that it's meant to protect people from are the very traits that ensure it can't do its job.
- pooper 3y agoWhen it is good enough, we should remove the ability for humans to drive cars manually in all new cars after that point.
- shadowgovt 3y agoOr even migrate the testing schema to more frequent re-checks and a harder pass condition. If people don't have to drive to thrive in society, we can make driving far more of a privilege. Contrast what a private pilot has to do to get certified.