3 ms·

I think you misread GP, they only said the appendix is not an evolutionary mystery, not that it doesn't serve a purpose. In fact, he noted the presence of lymp

I think you misread GP, they only said the appendix is not an evolutionary mystery, not that it doesn't serve a purpose. In fact, he noted the presence of lymphoid tissue, which makes is useful to the organism, as stated by the article as well.

pazimzadeh 3y ago
The main article claims that the appendix is not useless. I don't think I misread GP: "they're just the ends of things that come together." [something about cyclops and male pregnancy] "Fun stories, completely useless" At best it's a series of straw man arguments with sprinkles of appeal to authority.
- saurik 3y ago
  I feel like maybe they didn't read the article and misinterpreted the double-negative in the headline.
  - killjoywashere 3y ago
    GP here (GGP?), I read the whole article.
- epgui 3y ago
  Mentioning their background is not necessarily an appeal to authority fallacy. It’s just metadata.
  - killjoywashere 3y ago
    > metadata. Exactly. Sort of like getting a picture and the metadata says "Nikon". Probably that picture didn't come from midjourney.
- pegasus 3y ago
  I read "fun stories" to refer to cyclops, male pregnancy and the deep mystery of the real purpose of the appendix. That's a plausible critique to me, and one which is compatible with the appendix being still useful. Same for the first comment you mention. Yes, it's just the ends of things that come together, but life makes use of that real-estate anyway. It's just not critical, and there is only a slight dent in immunity when removed.
- brylie 3y ago
  They used paragraphs to separate complete thoughts. Note, GP explicitly mentions the following in their last paragraph, and make no claims that the appendix is useless: > This idea that the vermiform appendix is some deep evolutionary mystery is sort of a low point of medicine that occasionally pokes its head up. It ranks up there with male pregnancy, and various birth defects that have given rise to stories of monsters, like Cyclops. Fun stories, completely useless.

pazimzadeh 3y ago

The main article claims that the appendix is not useless. I don't think I misread GP: "they're just the ends of things that come together." [something about cyclops and male pregnancy] "Fun stories, completely useless" At best it's a series of straw man arguments with sprinkles of appeal to authority.

saurik 3y ago
I feel like maybe they didn't read the article and misinterpreted the double-negative in the headline.
- killjoywashere 3y ago
  GP here (GGP?), I read the whole article.
epgui 3y ago
Mentioning their background is not necessarily an appeal to authority fallacy. It’s just metadata.
- killjoywashere 3y ago
  > metadata. Exactly. Sort of like getting a picture and the metadata says "Nikon". Probably that picture didn't come from midjourney.
pegasus 3y ago
I read "fun stories" to refer to cyclops, male pregnancy and the deep mystery of the real purpose of the appendix. That's a plausible critique to me, and one which is compatible with the appendix being still useful. Same for the first comment you mention. Yes, it's just the ends of things that come together, but life makes use of that real-estate anyway. It's just not critical, and there is only a slight dent in immunity when removed.
brylie 3y ago
They used paragraphs to separate complete thoughts. Note, GP explicitly mentions the following in their last paragraph, and make no claims that the appendix is useless: > This idea that the vermiform appendix is some deep evolutionary mystery is sort of a low point of medicine that occasionally pokes its head up. It ranks up there with male pregnancy, and various birth defects that have given rise to stories of monsters, like Cyclops. Fun stories, completely useless.