4 ms·
Nothing you said convinces me that the uvula and appendix have no purpose. I assume that ends of things do come together a lot during development, but why does
by pazimzadeh 3y ago
Nothing you said convinces me that the uvula and appendix have no purpose. I assume that ends of things do come together a lot during development, but why does that imply no importance? Sounds like a classic case of chesterton's fence. and I hate to say it but argument from authority is pretty boring.
- baxtr 3y agoAnd there is nothing in the article either that convinced you?
- pazimzadeh 3y agoYeah, it convinced me of the opposite. The appendix is probably not useless.
- prometheon1 3y agoIs it an argument from authority or an argument from experience?
- pazimzadeh 3y agoExperience would mean he's taken out a bunch of people's appendices and nothing bad has happened. Which still wouldn't prove that the appendix has no purpose at all.
- glfharris 3y agoHe's a pathologist, so if he has removed someone's appendix they'd probably be dead. Pedantry aside, your point still stands.
- killjoywashere 3y agoI've done a fair number of autopsies and have never even heard of someone ending up on the autopsy table secondary to an appendectomy. I'm sure it's happened, but, on balance, if the docs say you need an appendectomy, they're probably right.
- glfharris 3y agoJust making a dumb joke that if it's the pathologist that's the person removing an appendix, they're probably dead already.
- epgui 3y agoExperience can mean a lot of things.
- pegasus 3y agoI think you misread GP, they only said the appendix is not an evolutionary mystery, not that it doesn't serve a purpose. In fact, he noted the presence of lymphoid tissue, which makes is useful to the organism, as stated by the article as well.
- pazimzadeh 3y agoThe main article claims that the appendix is not useless. I don't think I misread GP: "they're just the ends of things that come together." [something about cyclops and male pregnancy] "Fun stories, completely useless" At best it's a series of straw man arguments with sprinkles of appeal to authority.
- saurik 3y agoI feel like maybe they didn't read the article and misinterpreted the double-negative in the headline.
- killjoywashere 3y agoGP here (GGP?), I read the whole article.
- epgui 3y agoMentioning their background is not necessarily an appeal to authority fallacy. It’s just metadata.
- killjoywashere 3y ago> metadata. Exactly. Sort of like getting a picture and the metadata says "Nikon". Probably that picture didn't come from midjourney.
- pegasus 3y agoI read "fun stories" to refer to cyclops, male pregnancy and the deep mystery of the real purpose of the appendix. That's a plausible critique to me, and one which is compatible with the appendix being still useful. Same for the first comment you mention. Yes, it's just the ends of things that come together, but life makes use of that real-estate anyway. It's just not critical, and there is only a slight dent in immunity when removed.