5 ms·
Except that being an ex-con means that at some point his standard NDA must have been insufficient/unenforceable... Or he made a bad hire, or trusted the wrong
by mdda 14y ago
Except that being an ex-con means that at some point his standard NDA must have been insufficient/unenforceable... Or he made a bad hire, or trusted the wrong people. Just sayin'.
- Mz 14y agoI do not understand why you would assert that. Anyone can make a mistake, ex con or not. So I don't follow your logic in tying the two things together. Do you think people simply cannot change? Signed: Puzzled and curious. Thanks.
- jeremyarussell 14y agoSeems to me that he's saying it's obvious he didn't do a good job at not getting caught considering he got caught. Nothing really about people not being able to change. I may be wrong though, but hopefully that clarifies.
- Mz 14y agoUm, I don't see that in the original remark. Hopefully the op will clarify. Thanks.
- sp332 14y agomdda just meant: If he was really so good, he wouldn't have been caught.
- Mz 14y agoThe legal dept at bigco where I once worked indicated that emloyee fraud was most often reported by the ex girlfriend/boyfriend. The Great Wall of China was breached by bribery. Getting caught doesn't prove incompetence. And, again, I don't see that in the remark made. Thanks.
- jeremyarussell 14y agoChoosing cohorts that won't rat you out happens to be an important part of not getting caught. In the case of Ex's someone who won't hold a grudge or seek vengeance, bribery well pick someone who has morals, then make sure to pay them enough to make bribery a non-issue.
- Mz 14y agoIIRC, The Great Wall was only breached once over hundreds of years. Competence != total invulnerability. I can't fathom why anyone would argue it should.