3 ms·
What a hit piece. He’s absurdly negative right from the beginning. I guess we can see why Apple declined to provide them an early review unit. The device is
by kj99 3y ago
What a hit piece. He’s absurdly negative right from the beginning. I guess we can see why Apple declined to provide them an early review unit.
The device is not perfect, but this ‘review’ borders on absolute bullshit.
Harping on about ‘vision bros’ and ‘scaring children’ and the ‘games aren’t fun’.
They clearly have an agenda.
- kibwen 3y ago> I guess we can see why Apple declined to provide them an early review unit. If Apple is so vengeful as to only provide review units to people who will give them glowing reviews, then that immediately invalidates every review from anyone who received an advance unit from Apple, because all of those reviews must have been made under the duress of knowing that anything other than a glowing review will put them on Apple's shit list. In other words, by your own logic, the only reviews that can be trusted to have any degree of truth are those from people who didn't receive review units, such as the OP. > They clearly have an agenda. If it's so clear, perhaps you could enlighten us?
- kj99 3y agoDo you hear yourself? There’s nothing ‘vengeful’ about not trusting a news outlet that has lost its objectivity. As for the rest of your comment - the logic simply doesn’t follow unless you believe axiomatically that the NYT is trustworthy and everyone else is not. It’s well documented that the NYT is agenda driven and pushes its own positions over objective reporting: When the New York Times lost its way https://econ.st/4bG2Kf8 https://econ.st/4bG2Kf8