4 ms·

If someone can't follow traffic laws, they shouldn't be on the road (regardless of mode of transportation)

jeromegv 3y ago
I see quite a bit of cars not coming to a 3 second stop, they mostly roll at slow speed and never actually stop the vehicle completely. Do you advocate for 70% of the drivers to be taken off the road?
- deleted 3y ago
  [deleted]
- Aloisius 3y ago
  The law is a complete stop in California, not a 3 second stop. And yeah, anyone rolling through stop signs shouldn't be driving. In cities that actually enforce traffic laws, you can get your license suspended for it.
  - FireBeyond 3y ago
    And since this is about (semi-) autonomous vehicles, in this case, lets not also forget the release of FSD that specifically allowed you to run stop signs.
danenania 3y ago
So anyone who drives 1 mph over the speed limit shouldn’t be on the road? There are laws and there are norms. The overlap is never exact.
- bsimpson 3y ago
  The laws should overlap with the norms more. It really bothers me that the laws don't reflect real life. It gives the authorities the ability to harass whoever they like for violating laws that are routinely ignored until a cop wants to start something. That's not okay.
- deleted 3y ago
  [deleted]
maxwellg 3y ago
Insisting that a bicycle needs to follow the same procedures as a 3000lb internal combustion engine driven vehicle is madness. The vast majority of car laws are completely inappropriate for bicycles. Bicycles are much smaller, go much slower, can stop much faster, etc.
- zilti 3y ago
  [flagged]
- ExoticPearTree 3y ago
  Then ride in dedicated bike lanes, but don't make up excuses why you should break the laws just because they are inconvenient to you.
  - deleted 3y ago
    [deleted]
  - agos 3y ago
    confine the bikes to the bike lanes, then don't build bike lanes (or build awful ones) and finally you'll be free of those pesky bikes! finally the cars will have the road all by themselves.
  - asoneth 3y ago
    > don't make up excuses why you should break the laws just because they are inconvenient to you I tend to agree, and obey the speed limit and come to a stop at stop signs when driving. I get passed by other drivers, sometimes dangerously, often illegally, several times a week. I would have sympathy for driver complaints about cyclists who ignore inconvenient traffic laws if drivers were any more law-abiding. If you want to drive faster, fine, change the speed limit. But don't just ignore laws you find inconvenient!
- infecto 3y ago
  I get what you’re saying but as a cyclist totally disagree. The problem I see at least while I was in SF, cyclists generally believed since they were riding a bike, they had the right of way in all scenarios. I still have vivid memories of almost smoking a cyclist while on my motorcycle only for them to be mad at me when I tried to explain to them that zipping in between lines of cars will get them run over. If you are to mingle bicycle son the same roads as cars, they need to follow the same rules.

I see quite a bit of cars not coming to a 3 second stop, they mostly roll at slow speed and never actually stop the vehicle completely. Do you advocate for 70% of the drivers to be taken off the road?

deleted 3y ago
[deleted]
Aloisius 3y ago
The law is a complete stop in California, not a 3 second stop. And yeah, anyone rolling through stop signs shouldn't be driving. In cities that actually enforce traffic laws, you can get your license suspended for it.
- FireBeyond 3y ago
  And since this is about (semi-) autonomous vehicles, in this case, lets not also forget the release of FSD that specifically allowed you to run stop signs.

danenania 3y ago

So anyone who drives 1 mph over the speed limit shouldn’t be on the road? There are laws and there are norms. The overlap is never exact.

bsimpson 3y ago
The laws should overlap with the norms more. It really bothers me that the laws don't reflect real life. It gives the authorities the ability to harass whoever they like for violating laws that are routinely ignored until a cop wants to start something. That's not okay.
deleted 3y ago
[deleted]

maxwellg 3y ago

Insisting that a bicycle needs to follow the same procedures as a 3000lb internal combustion engine driven vehicle is madness. The vast majority of car laws are completely inappropriate for bicycles. Bicycles are much smaller, go much slower, can stop much faster, etc.

zilti 3y ago
[flagged]
ExoticPearTree 3y ago
Then ride in dedicated bike lanes, but don't make up excuses why you should break the laws just because they are inconvenient to you.
- deleted 3y ago
  [deleted]
- agos 3y ago
  confine the bikes to the bike lanes, then don't build bike lanes (or build awful ones) and finally you'll be free of those pesky bikes! finally the cars will have the road all by themselves.
- asoneth 3y ago
  > don't make up excuses why you should break the laws just because they are inconvenient to you I tend to agree, and obey the speed limit and come to a stop at stop signs when driving. I get passed by other drivers, sometimes dangerously, often illegally, several times a week. I would have sympathy for driver complaints about cyclists who ignore inconvenient traffic laws if drivers were any more law-abiding. If you want to drive faster, fine, change the speed limit. But don't just ignore laws you find inconvenient!
infecto 3y ago
I get what you’re saying but as a cyclist totally disagree. The problem I see at least while I was in SF, cyclists generally believed since they were riding a bike, they had the right of way in all scenarios. I still have vivid memories of almost smoking a cyclist while on my motorcycle only for them to be mad at me when I tried to explain to them that zipping in between lines of cars will get them run over. If you are to mingle bicycle son the same roads as cars, they need to follow the same rules.