> All of these things can be associated with objective facts, not just relative interpretation. As a for-instance, Guernica is a depiction of an important event

> All of these things can be associated with objective facts, not just relative interpretation. As a for-instance, Guernica is a depiction of an important event in history, by an important Spanish painter, who was exploring new ways to visualize and record the world through his own lens. Those may be objective facts (I'd argue some of them are subjective judgements, but let's put that aside), but they are not the content of the painting. As Magritte would remind us, Guernica (the painting, rather than the town) does not contain any "screaming women, dead babies, and dismembered soldiers"; rather it contains arrangements of pigments that we interpret as representing those things.