This is a bad reply that seeks to compare all cops, of which very few are arrest-level criminals as a percentage, to the level of the hardcore criminals that th

This is a bad reply that seeks to compare all cops, of which very few are arrest-level criminals as a percentage, to the level of the hardcore criminals that they exist to police. The answer makes no sense in the context of the statement to which I am replying nor in the context of my reply. Its a trollish answer that is seeking to argue for the sake of arguing, because we can't allow that law enforcement are are preferrable to criminals. The extremists on this forum are something else. I didn't asky you for a pedantic debate on parsing criminal value. I won't join you in not seeing it as "us vs them" because you are choosing to blend low level and high level crime into a single category. Yes, the guy who was arrested for drunk-in-public isn't "them". Yes, the person who was arrested for street robbery is "them", and who almost always has a long rap sheet. Your last phrase is indecipherable.