3 ms·
> I for one don't notice any quality/resolution difference between native apps and a mirrored Mac screen. I wonder how so different opinions exist on things th
by cubefox 3y ago
> I for one don't notice any quality/resolution difference between native apps and a mirrored Mac screen.
I wonder how so different opinions exist on things that should be pretty much the same for everyone.
- Retric 3y agoPeople’s eyes vary quite a bit even with corrective lenses.
- makeitdouble 3y agoSome people immediately notice 90/120Hz screns vs 60. Some will see pixels on a 3K 14" screen while it will "good enough" for most. Aside from sheer eye sight, I think there's also attention and sensibility to these specific things. The same way web designers recognize fonts from 4 letters when generic users barely pay attention to whether it's serif.
- ekms 3y agoSome people have much worse vision? Makes sense that people would perceive visual clarity differently
- lukev 3y agoIt's hard to talk about something so based in individual perception: it's true, my eyes could literally be different. However, my strong suspicion is that the visionOS native apps have a larger font size and bigger, smoother UX elements. In this case, the mind doesn't notice a little blurriness around the edges. Whereas with a mirrored display, there's tons of tiny thin lines where it's easier to notice that visual acuity is not 100%.