3 ms·
> “Will any stakeholder pay for it?”. If your stakeholders are serious about application security, then I would expect so. I want to live in your world where t
by pdimitar 3y ago
> “Will any stakeholder pay for it?”. If your stakeholders are serious about application security, then I would expect so.
I want to live in your world where they apparently care. In mine they never did. 20+ years career.
> You’re really overstating your case. There is nothing intrinsic to frameworks that makes this difficult.
You could be right that I am overstating it, though you also shouldn't underestimate the "blessed" ways that web frameworks do stuff. In practically all that I worked on they just wanted you to chuck either a database URL or break it apart on host/port/user/pass/db-name and didn't make any effort to dynamically create / drop users as the application is creating and deleting them.
> The frameworks I’ve used have had the ability to register a transaction initialiser during pool setup.
As said above, I know it's doable. What I am saying is that nobody ever gave me the time to do it and with time I stopped caring. Turned out that putting the currently logged in users in global logger and telemetry contexts is good enough. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯