4 ms·
In LA there are tons of "co-living" spaces where they're basically renting out bedrooms for $2500-$4000 a month! It's the similar to living with roommates exce
by nox101 3y ago
In LA there are tons of "co-living" spaces where they're basically renting out bedrooms for $2500-$4000 a month! It's the similar to living with roommates except each roommate has their own lease and you have no choice in who becomes your roommate.
I don't know any actual stats, only that in searching for an apartment they came up a lot in searches and I assumed it was partly to make more money (a 3br apartment with 3 people paying $3k each is $9k vs renting the whole apartment for $6k-7k)
But, also, rent in general is too damn high and it's lowers the price "for some definition of lower".
- EA-3167 3y agoThis is inevitable when vast numbers of people all want to live as close to the centers of a handful of major cities as they can. You either build megacities, let the market dictate who can afford to live there, or maybe start seriously realizing that from an economic and environmental point of view... maybe remote work is the solution.
- lukas099 3y agoI'm not convinced remote work is better than the market solution from an environmental point of view. Seems like having people as densely concentrated as they can be is best from an environmental standpoint. Remote is definitely better than the status quo of subsidized suburbs housing car commuters though.
- rtz121 3y agoIf we grind down humans into fine dust, we could fit trillions of people into San Francisco.
- sjwhevvvvvsj 3y agoThis is a Y Combinator forum, don’t give them ideas, I wouldn’t be surprised if somebody is already shopping out that pitch deck and Sam A is opening his checkbook.
- lukas099 3y agoThat would probably be great from an environmental standpoint. Notice I didn't say that we should only look from the environmnental standpoint.
- buzzert 3y ago> subsidized suburbs housing car commuters Suburbs are subsidized? What do you mean?
- lukas099 3y agoThey generate little value per acre. More acres = more infrastructure cost. Look at the graph in this example @2:59: https://youtu.be/7Nw6qyyrTeI?si=BVi7PNEizNnQ7FKh&t=179 https://youtu.be/7Nw6qyyrTeI?si=BVi7PNEizNnQ7FKh&t=179