42 ms·

For historic perspective: https://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/z1/dataviz/dfa/distribute/chart/#range:1989.3,2023.3;quarter:136;series:Net%20worth;demograph

For historic perspective: https://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/z1/dataviz/dfa/distribute/chart/#range:1989.3,2023.3;quarter:136;series:Net%20worth;demographic:age;population:1,3,5,7;units:shares https://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/z1/dataviz/dfa/distr... https://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/z1/dataviz/dfa/distribute/chart/#range:1989.3,2023.3;quarter:136;series:Net%20worth;demographic:age;population:all;units:levels https://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/z1/dataviz/dfa/distr... Only seems to go back to 1989 though.

lupire 3y ago
This graph is more informative than the article and effectively refuses its thesis. 40-55s are more threatened than under 40s.
- hotpotamus 3y ago
  It does seem like Gen X is going to get shafted a bit harder than others. Boomers are the richest cohort in history and their children are the Millennials; they may be on the poorer side now, but they do stand to inherit if end-of-life care doesn't soak it up first.