6 ms·
Exactly, people think you need a genius to work in a fab when, in reality, there are more than enough people you could train, most American students come out of
by thiago_fm 3y ago
Exactly, people think you need a genius to work in a fab when, in reality, there are more than enough people you could train, most American students come out of university ready for it;
It's just that they end up working in a startup creating yet another project management tool because of the way capital is allocated in the US and how high salaries are in certain areas.
No country will ever be competent at everything; the US doesn't need fabs. The best for the US in this situation is to figure out how they can outsource this to cheaper countries that are democratic and not possibly the victims of an invasion soon.
In Asia itself (for the distance factor to Taiwan or TSMC headquarters), there are plenty of booming countries economies that, despite having a slightly higher cost (due to supply chain dynamics) than Taiwan, have a more stable foreign policy and good legal framework.
- Rapzid 3y agoI disagree. We do need fabs because we need the expertise. As we do have fabs and do have the expertise. Intel produces all of their most advanced chips in the USA. The chips are competitively priced and made with US wages so...
- kavalg 3y agoUntil "recently" (mobile phone era) Intel/AMD basically had no competition. They completely missed the mobile market and are now seeing competition from ARM in laptop/server. An there is also RISC-V on the radar. When/if CPU architecture becomes more de-monopolized, manufacturing competitiveness will be a big factor.