3 ms·
I'm also an old fogey by some metrics, but I don't relate to that sentiment very much. I think that using "we" and "apologizing" is fair for most user-facing a
by ragnese 3y ago
I'm also an old fogey by some metrics, but I don't relate to that sentiment very much.
I think that using "we" and "apologizing" is fair for most user-facing applications. It's kind of like the old adage: the customer is always right. Obviously the user wanted to accomplish something, and tried something to achieve it, but your software couldn't figure out what they wanted or didn't have enough information to do it, etc. So, it's kind of like a store clerk saying "I'm sorry; we're all out of that color dress."
Now, I would say this kind of "polite", human-centric, UI is not appropriate for e.g., sysadmin stuff like coreutils. I think it's perfectly fine if `cat /some/file` errors by saying "That file doesn't exist. Get bent."
Also, just to inject some unrelated cynicism... To your example about updating, I think with how pushy companies like Microsoft are with updates, it might actually be more accurate for them to say "We are updating your computer and enacting our will with your equipment."
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- zilti 3y ago> It's kind of like the old adage: the customer is always right. And that BS is exactly why we have all those entitled adult babies now.