> I also think in general, to effect change, to campaign for a single thing, easily explained, is the most successful approach. What part of 'You can't take pe

> I also think in general, to effect change, to campaign for a single thing, easily explained, is the most successful approach. What part of 'You can't take people's stuff without first proving it should be taken, in a court of law' is hard to comprehend? There's no need to over-complicate the argument that this is blatant state-sanctioned robbery and deprivation of property without due process.