2 ms·
TIs the decision of where to send the money made on a per-case basis by the local PD? If so, that sounds like just one more option to seize for profit or haras
by actionfromafar 3y ago
TIs the decision of where to send the money made on a per-case basis by the local PD?
If so, that sounds like just one more option to seize for profit or harass if the case is too weak.
I still think if the only option is to transfer, the general incentive structure is improved. Stealing with profit motive plus harassment is worse than stealing just for harassment.
I also think in general, to effect change, to campaign for a single thing, easily explained, is the most successful approach.
- genocidicbunny 3y ago> I also think in general, to effect change, to campaign for a single thing, easily explained, is the most successful approach. What part of 'You can't take people's stuff without first proving it should be taken, in a court of law' is hard to comprehend? There's no need to over-complicate the argument that this is blatant state-sanctioned robbery and deprivation of property without due process.