1600 words that are only an update to a paywalled review of another paywalled magazine article. We're missing all the context, but the part we can read has a s

1600 words that are only an update to a paywalled review of another paywalled magazine article. We're missing all the context, but the part we can read has a strange kind of logic to it. The claim is that you should only take advice on how to build successful relationships from people who don't know how to build successful relationships. This makes no sense, but is padded with so many filler paragraphs that by the time the point is made, the dots one would need to connect to notice the contradiction have almost evaporated from working memory. The final sentence is good, though: "The people I know from various oft-discussed groups - transgender, super-religious, autistic, rich, etc - are all nicer and more normal than their public representatives would lead you to believe." People who act as "public representatives" are often insufferable narcissists, and that's true regardless of the group they claim to represent.