3 ms·
>For example, by not sending the DNT header in all requests? DNT is all but dead; it never got past the draft specification phase - even though being adopted b
by felsokning 3y ago
>For example, by not sending the DNT header in all requests?
DNT is all but dead; it never got past the draft specification phase - even though being adopted by the major players in the browser realm. (Most have already removed the feature.)
GPC[1] is supposed to be the new DNT but I doubt it will have as much success.
[1] - https://globalprivacycontrol.org/press-release/20201007.html https://globalprivacycontrol.org/press-release/20201007.html
- repelsteeltje 3y ago> DNT is all but dead Not sure, but I think a German court(?) recently ruled it's a legitimate way for a user to express intent that should be honoured by website. Technically there isn't a reason to look for other means, the reason is mostly that advertisers would rather not have visitors choose this option. The reason DNT was almost instantly rejected, for example, was that the compromise text mentioned the user enable DNT, but then some browsers enabled it by default. Advertisers: Hurray! We found a reason to ignore user preferences! So, for all I care it might be DNT, GPC or a plug-in that auto-clicks REJECT COOKIE. It's the default I would expect. It would be great the web simply would not offer ad targeting unless I explicitly enabled some tracking beacon because I sincerely like targeted ads better than old-school billboard.
- rapnie 3y ago> Not sure, but I think a German court(?) recently ruled it's a legitimate way for a user to express intent that should be honoured by website. Yep, regarding LinkedIn. See: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38081633 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38081633
- YukiElectronics 3y ago> So, for all I care it might be DNT, GPC or a plug-in that auto-clicks REJECT COOKIE. Regarding the plugin/extension option, there's one developed by Aarhus University in Denmark called Consent-O-Matic[0] — it moves the cookie dialog to a corner (or hides it, if you prefer) and either the options to the minimum on the majority of sites (I've only experienced it not working once in the two years I've used it) and plays nice with the other "privacy" extensions I've got installed (CanvasBlocker, Privacy Badger, uBlock Origin, LocalCDN, etc.) [0]: https://consentomatic.au.dk/ https://consentomatic.au.dk/
- throwbadubadu 3y agoIt would have been just way toooo easy and non dark-pattern to replace the annoying cookie dialogues with that :(