3 ms·
cpubenchmark score would be much more useful than GHz, when comparing CPUs across 10+ years of generations. It doesn't look like you have EPYCs listed, or Thre
by cjbprime 3y ago
cpubenchmark score would be much more useful than GHz, when comparing CPUs across 10+ years of generations.
It doesn't look like you have EPYCs listed, or Threadripper? (These are some of the best CPU deals on eBay.)
- judge2020 3y agoWorth pointing out this is specifically regarding "cpubenchmark.net", not "cpu.userbenchmark.com" or anything else from User Benchmark, which is known to have a heavy bias against AMD.
- attilakun 3y agoI'll have to look into whether there's some public API to pull cpubenchmark score as I agree, it'd be immensely useful. To your other point, EPYC and Threadripper are listed now: https://www.cpuscout.com/?Processor+Type=Epyc https://www.cpuscout.com/?Processor+Type=Epyc https://www.cpuscout.com/?Processor+Model=AMD%2520Ryzen%2520Threadripper%25201900X%2CAMD%2520Ryzen%2520Threadripper%25201920X%2CAMD%2520Ryzen%2520Threadripper%25201950X https://www.cpuscout.com/?Processor+Model=AMD%2520Ryzen%2520...