2 ms·
Eh, do'h, of course. There's a few selectors anyway, but I'd have to check which ones exactly. :eq(n) and :visible from a quick check (:nth-child(n) can replace
by arp242 3y ago
Eh, do'h, of course. There's a few selectors anyway, but I'd have to check which ones exactly. :eq(n) and :visible from a quick check (:nth-child(n) can replace :eq(n) in some cases, but not all).
- mkl 3y agoYes, I've used :nth-of-type(n) for that too. Visibility is surprisingly messy though.