3 ms·
I did watch the video. > which makes all the discussion more appealing I have never experienced AI making anything more appealing. YMMV. I also have no need t
by 2024throwaway 3y ago
I did watch the video.
> which makes all the discussion more appealing
I have never experienced AI making anything more appealing. YMMV. I also have no need to generate images.
> have you look at the size and quality of the code? It is enough small
I agree it is a very small code base, in that it does basically nothing. Not sure how I'm supposed to view this as a positive. As far as quality, it looks like pretty much all the other python code I've seen.
> One of the code reviewers is a top Python community participant though.
Cool.
- wslh 3y agoIt seems you don't need Geppetto. Which is fine. We need it and for several reasons (e.g. security) we write it from scratch. The use case for integrating Slack with ChatGPT is well known, so it is useful for several organizations. Enough.
- 2024throwaway 3y agoI have actually built a tool very similar, slack <-> openai interface. Except it does things like augment the input prompts, and can perform additional action based on the outputs. So no, I don't have a need for something as simple as a ChatGPT pass through. You might get a better reaction if you weren't so defensive over a sub 500 LOC project.
- wslh 3y agoThe sub 500 LOC is a positive thing. If someone is looking for code to fork, learn and/or copy 500 is ideal instead of knowing a lot of details of more complex piece of code. I receive a good reaction though.