It is not intended to be pedantically interpreted in the way where everything is technically feasible, and the long legal text outlines examples of something no

It is not intended to be pedantically interpreted in the way where everything is technically feasible, and the long legal text outlines examples of something not being feasible. The goal is solely to not decline repair for arbitrary reason, such as "we won't replace your battery because a moisture indicator has tripped" or "someone else had touched this so we won't look at it". Even if this wasn't clear, imprecise wording is not a carte blanche to interpretation on this side of the pond - a court of law will only entertain reasonable interpretations from legal ambiguity, and "spend millions rebuilding the factory" is obviously not a reasonable response to a single phone repair request. However, within the specified time period they must ensure spare parts are available, and thus must not shut down manufacturing prematurely.