3 ms·

Well, we arrive at the whole "the optimal amount of fraud is non-zero" train of thought, otherwise there is no money-making opportunity. They push on the legal

Well, we arrive at the whole "the optimal amount of fraud is non-zero" train of thought, otherwise there is no money-making opportunity. They push on the legal aspects of other problems, but I don't see them pushing on the legal aspects of this. Mozilla receives half a billion dollars per year from Google, making up most of their revenue. Mozilla's CEO is also paid millions of dollars each year. If they can't survive as-is whilst paying out those kinds of salaries with such revenue, that's a management problem.

wolverine876 3y ago
> Well, we arrive at the whole "the optimal amount of fraud is non-zero" train of thought, otherwise there is no money-making opportunity. So? Do doctors want you to have cancer? Do undertakers want you to die? Yet they still get paid. > They push on the legal aspects of other problems, but I don't see them pushing on the legal aspects of this. That's not persuasive, unless you are in that business. Where is a list of the things they do? > If they can't survive as-is whilst paying out those kinds of salaries with such revenue, that's a management problem. While I don't like the CEO's pay, competitors have far greater budgets - and pay CEOs far more - as do many businesses. The amount itself isn't evidence. Where is the evidence that Mozilla isn't allocating funds well?