Assuming that the article accurately reports the facts (I have my doubts) and these unnamed toothbrushes were used in DDoS attacks, it seems like the obvious d

Assuming that the article accurately reports the facts (I have my doubts) and these unnamed toothbrushes were used in DDoS attacks, it seems like the obvious deterrent would be for the harmed party to sue for damages. That seems like it work to deter companies from making internet connected when they aren't really needed.