3 ms·
> To date they've done very little Not true. You can now follow Adam Mosseri's Threads account from Mastodon. And like you said they are committed to fully ro
by threeseed 3y ago
> To date they've done very little
Not true. You can now follow Adam Mosseri's Threads account from Mastodon.
And like you said they are committed to fully rolling it out this year.
- jakebsky 3y agoLimited functionality for a specified subset of users counts as "very little" to my mind given that they launched 6 months ago and have a team of hundreds working on it. But like I said, I sincerely do hope Threads follows through on their plan to federate. But it's just not correct to claim that they already have.
- threeseed 3y agoMaybe you I and understand the software development process differently. Supporting one user end to end is a huge milestone and the first step in rolling it out to the other hundreds of millions of users. Especially when Threads isn't a standalone platform but is built on top of Instagram which means we could see it integrated with ActivityPub as well. The fact that Meta cares about ActivityPub at all is a huge win for open, interoperable standards.
- edavis 3y agoI don't know... the whole Threads + ActivityPub thing just seems like Meta trying to keep the regulators at bay rather than them actually embracing the ethos of becoming a major federated social media player. So launch in July 2023, handful of accounts have AP support in November-ish 2023, full AP support end of 2024? I guess it's not nothing, they did have to bolt something entirely new on top of IG's infrastructure. But for a team that big, feels like we'd be seeing more if it was a true priority for them. Plus Threads leaning towards opt-in AP support which will only inhibit uptake (that was the last I heard, anyway). I'd be shocked if Instagram ever went with ActivityPub, though.