4 ms·
Finally, a review that talks about that it is basically impossible to share this 3499$ device with others. This is such a glaring miss on Apple's part, I can't
by deng 3y ago
Finally, a review that talks about that it is basically impossible to share this 3499$ device with others. This is such a glaring miss on Apple's part, I can't believe all the other reviewers simply ignored this fact.
- steveBK123 3y agoYeah given the 20+ sizes of light seals & possible use of prescription lenses.. this is not a device for sharing. And that's ignoring the software issues from Apples willful ignorance around user profiles/accounts on other devices in the iOS/iPad ecosystem ..
- FireBeyond 3y agoNot to mention the pundits (and Apple) talking about re-imagining the family movie night and theater going experiences. Huh, yeah, Mom and Dad and their 2.2 kids on the couch, all plugged in to an AVP, for only $14,000 (I'll round down to 2 kids)...
- bnolsen 3y agoI'm not sure it's appropriate to use "apple" and "share" in the same sentence. /s It's a problem with VR in general. I have a quest 1 which actually wasn't too hard to share with my kids. The novelty did wear off after some months.
- threetonesun 3y agoFrom the company that refuses to allow for multiple user accounts on an iPad.
- tootie 3y agoHonestly, I believe it's very intentional. The idea is this device will be personal, like a phone or watch. Not a device you'll park in dock at home. If you have a family, they'll all need their own headset.
- deng 3y agoI also believe it's intentional, and it fits very well with the dystopian marketing towards young singles and divorced dads. However, this alone would be a showstopper for me. The idea to buy a 3.5k$ device, which is ideal for watching media, and not being able to lend it to my wife or kids, is just ridiculous.