3 ms·
It's interesting seeing so many of these takes on AVP. So many people imagined how they'd use it when it came out. Now that it's out, they're realizing that rea
by HumblyTossed 3y ago
It's interesting seeing so many of these takes on AVP. So many people imagined how they'd use it when it came out. Now that it's out, they're realizing that reality doesn't meet their imagination. Not that AVP is bad or that it doesn't work correctly, it just doesn't do some of the things people expected it to or it has more limitations than they expected.
Which, to me is odd why they would think this because this is an Apple product. You will only ever be able to use it the way Apple wants you to use it. If it doesn't fit your imagined use case, Apple expects you to adapt.
- zhobbs 3y agoI think it's just a function of the Apple marketing overselling the passthrough quality and productivity use cases.
- querulous 3y agothe passthrough quality is a real letdown given the marketing. it's like looking at everything through a grimy, unwashed window i never expected it to be good as a productivity device because my own experience is while screen real estate is nice what really matters is the ergonomics of your work space and wearing a pair of ski goggles is never going to be ergonomic
- noahtallen 3y agoOpinions are mixed the passthrough quality: https://youtu.be/UvkgmyfMPks?si=ElAWNbsyEN6t_wmP https://youtu.be/UvkgmyfMPks?si=ElAWNbsyEN6t_wmP
- ActorNightly 3y ago>Now that it's out, they're realizing that reality doesn't meet their imagination. Pretty much another iteration of cycle of VR adopters. Many of us went through this with original devices.