2 ms·
The problem is rarely cost, it's operational overhead. Using SQS for a queue rather than my already-existing Postgres means that I have to: - Write a whole bu
by williamdclt 3y ago
The problem is rarely cost, it's operational overhead.
Using SQS for a queue rather than my already-existing Postgres means that I have to:
- Write a whole bunch of IaC, figuring out the correct access policies
- Set up monitoring: figure out how to monitor, write some more IaC
- Worry about access control: I just increased the attack surface of my application
- Wire it up in my application so that I can connect to SQS
- Understand how SQS works, how to use its API
It's often worth it, but adding an additional moving piece into your infra is always a lot of added cognitive load.
- fuy 3y ago+. And then you have to figure everything one more time when you decide to move to (or to add support for) Azure/GCP.