3 ms·
If you don't need tagging (as http://danluu.com/ http://danluu.com/ doesn't, for example), you can use my "no workflow" solution: * draft in markdown * render
by readscore 3y ago
If you don't need tagging (as http://danluu.com/ http://danluu.com/ doesn't, for example), you can use my "no workflow" solution:
* draft in markdown
* render in HTML (using any Markdown to HTML tool, e.g. pandoc)
* link your CSS in the HTML file.
* push to your preferred serving platform
This has the advantage of getting you started as quick as you can open an editor.
If after 5 posts you are wanting a tool, pick whichever (Hugo).
- coxley 3y ago+1 This puts the focus on writing content vs. spending unlimited time in the setup.
- thatgurjot 3y agoI like this as a starting point, gonna recommend it from now on! Although the benefit of using a static site generator like Hugo is the ability to short codes to reuse code snippets (like embedding videos or images). But that can wait - getting five posts out first is important!