3 ms·
> My big question with those banners is: what the hell does "legitimate interest" mean? There is a definition in the regulation, which IIRC basically amounts t
by dspillett 3y ago
> My big question with those banners is: what the hell does "legitimate interest" mean?
There is a definition in the regulation, which IIRC basically amounts to a rewording of "strictly necessary". This definition does not cover what companies use it to excuse.
The way the phrase is actually used, for much wider tracking, what it has come to mean is "we see your preference not to be logged and stalked for the benefit of our business plan, but fuck you and your preference we want to do it anyway".
This is why the legitimate interest check boxes are often hidden in nested concertinas or other UX nightmares, to make it extra difficult to opt out of what should be an opt in. Once a body has gone this far to try engineer an accidental opt-in they are _definitely_ not to be trusted IMO. Though it is likely too late if you really care: they may have already dropped their payload & sent at least some information back to base, and will "accidentally" not remove it later or find some other excuse as to why they shouldn't.
- mcv 3y ago> "we see your preference not to be logged and stalked for the benefit of our business plan, but fuck you and your preference we want to do it anyway". That's certainly how I've been reading it. What I really want is for my browser to automatically block all of it. I know Firefox blocks a bunch of stuff, and ad blockers probably do too, but I have no idea how thorough they are and whether there are ways of tracking they can't block at all. There probably are. (Except login and preference cookies; those are legitimate. And only relevant for sites where I actually login and set preferences. I'm pretty sure most sites I just visit to read some article, have no reason to set any cookies at all.)