4 ms·
From what I've overheard of critical theory, this is the argument between historical contingency (historicism) and social construction (constructionism). https
by anonymouskimmer 3y ago
From what I've overheard of critical theory, this is the argument between historical contingency (historicism) and social construction (constructionism).
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01916599.2019.1653351 https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01916599.2019.1...
: Historicism, dominating nineteenth-century Western thought and overseeing the professionalization of historical studies, advocated an understanding of the present condition of the human world as developing out of past conditions. Constructionism, dominating the second half of the twentieth century, understood the present condition as the recent invention of certain ‘historical’ environments, without prior existence.
People used to have letters to the editor and billboards. Even in computers there were login messages, user signatures, and presumably notes taped to shared terminals.
- anonymouskimmer 3y agoTo add on to social media precursors, which can functionally be called social media 2.0 if one is following historicism, randomdata mentions newspaper society pages as similar to timeline feeds: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39272068 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39272068 And basically forever we've had dedicated gossips for social media 1.0. I'm kind of with prmoustache. It becomes a thing when people start treating it like a thing, and said treatment involves the labeling.