so many issues straight away > should you complete 70% of your goals to 100%? Or should you complete 100% of your goals at 70%? explicitly addressed in variou

so many issues straight away > should you complete 70% of your goals to 100%? Or should you complete 100% of your goals at 70%? explicitly addressed in various articles and books. you average your scores across objectives and KRs to get a score. So the answer is both, looking for average score of 0.7 > if your key result is "migrate 100% of users to the new system" and you only migrate 70%, guess what? Now you're stuck maintaining two systems in perpetuity so you're going to migrate all of your users in a big bang moment?? hell no. it'll be bit by bit no matter what. of course you're maintaining two systems, that's a sign of a good migration, not a bad one. the KR just helps you get done with it faster of course there are valid criticisms of okrs, and many (most?) teams get them wrong. but saying "okrs are bullshit" has become a common trope for new-age companies who use that as a way to differentiate themselves. do you really think Andy Grove and John Doerr are bullshit artists?